A lot of ‘performance problems’ are actually asset problems in disguise. With Facebook media buying, the asset you choose shapes permissions, billing control, and how safely you can hand work off between people. This article is aimed at a two-person media buying duo dealing with compliance sensitivity and uses a strategy memo guardrails framing: you’ll see how to vet access, organize onboarding, protect measurement, and keep operations compliant. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you hand over access, reconcile asset history, and log the outcome. A procurement-style scorecard works because it forces you to write down what you are assuming. (7 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). Most incidents start as ‘minor’ audit log confusion and end as weeks of delayed scaling. When Facebook workflows involve contractors, the question is never ‘can we run ads’—it’s ‘can we unwind access cleanly’. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you verify access, align payment profile, and log the outcome.

A structured way to choose account assets for paid acquisition

Before you scale Facebook, decide what a healthy account selection framework looks like for a two-person media buying duo under compliance sensitivity. https://npprteam.shop/en/articles/accounts-review/a-guide-to-choosing-accounts-for-facebook-ads-google-ads-tiktok-ads-based-on-npprteamshop/ Use it as a reference frame for comparing account assets, and insist on explicit access and billing checks before you commit; start with audit log and only then expand scope.. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you lock down audit log, verify spend pattern, and log the outcome. (14 checkpoints, the first 10 days). Instead of chasing mythical ‘perfect’ assets, build a process that survives imperfect inputs. (21 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you hand over permissions, simulate admin roster, and log the outcome. Instead of chasing mythical ‘perfect’ assets, build a process that survives imperfect inputs. Treat the account selection framework as infrastructure: if payment profile is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. (9 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). Even when you scale fast, the goal is to keep changes reversible within two reporting cycles. (14 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you reconcile audit log, simulate payment profile, and log the outcome. The moment you split responsibilities, you need explicit rules for escalation and rollback.

When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you align ownership, align payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you simulate asset history, stress-test audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you simulate billing, verify billing, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you map admin roster, hand over admin roster, and log the outcome. Under compliance sensitivity, teams often optimize for speed and forget that admin roster is the real failure domain. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you reconcile billing, map payment profile, and log the outcome. (3 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). The moment you split responsibilities, you need explicit rules for escalation and rollback. (10 checkpoints, the first 10 days). Even when you scale fast, the goal is to keep changes reversible within the first 72 hours. (30 checkpoints, the first 10 days).

When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you document ownership, separate admin roster, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you lock down payment profile, document access, and log the outcome. A small mismatch in permissions can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. (10 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you separate admin roster, align support trail, and log the outcome. (10 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you lock down audit log, verify admin roster, and log the outcome. A good purchase looks boring on paper because every actor—operator, finance, and reviewer—knows their lane. The fastest way to waste budget is to start spend before you stress-test ownership and confirm who can approve changes. (12 checkpoints, 3–5 business days).

Start with boundaries: define ownership, operators, and reviewers

Before you commit, write a one-page note on documentation so everyone agrees on the same reality. When Facebook workflows involve contractors, the question is never ‘can we run ads’—it’s ‘can we unwind access cleanly’. (30 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). Build the audit cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (8 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). What looks like a ‘deal’ can be expensive if it creates ongoing manual babysitting. (7 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you hand over ownership, separate payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you verify ownership, stress-test audit log, and log the outcome. If the seller cannot explain the asset history without hand-waving, that is a governance signal, not a negotiation point. (12 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you hand over spend pattern, verify payment profile, and log the outcome. (7 checkpoints, one full week).

  • Name the single accountable owner and the backup owner.
  • Agree on naming conventions before the first campaign is created.
  • Set a rule for removing access within 24 hours of role changes.
  • Define which changes require finance approval.

If you cannot align ownership in writing, you should not treat the asset as production-ready. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you lock down ownership, separate permissions, and log the outcome. (9 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you reconcile spend pattern, stress-test admin roster, and log the outcome. A compliance-sensitive team wins by reducing ambiguity, not by adding tricks. (30 checkpoints, the first 10 days). Under multi-geo rollout, teams often optimize for speed and forget that admin roster is the real failure domain. Even when you scale fast, the goal is to keep changes reversible within one full week. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you hand over asset history, document ownership, and log the outcome. (5 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). Build the handoff cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (9 checkpoints, 24–48 hours).

Facebook Facebook Business Managers: fit-testing the asset against your workflow

Before you scale Facebook, decide what a healthy facebook business managers looks like for a two-person media buying duo under compliance sensitivity. buy Facebook facebook business managers with audit-friendly handoff and simple governance makes sense when the asset history is understandable, access is reversible, and measurement can start cleanly; start with access and only then expand scope.. A procurement-style scorecard works because it forces you to write down what you are assuming. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you reconcile admin roster, stress-test ownership, and log the outcome. Think in handoffs: who receives the asset, who validates it, and who signs off before any spend is increased. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you align audit log, document access, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you map admin roster, verify asset history, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you lock down access, map billing, and log the outcome. (12 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you simulate admin roster, separate billing, and log the outcome. (8 checkpoints, the first 72 hours).

Treat the Facebook Business Managers as infrastructure: if ownership is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you map asset history, document audit log, and log the outcome. Under multi-client complexity, teams often optimize for speed and forget that billing is the real failure domain. Design the workflow so that losing a single login does not freeze delivery. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you stress-test audit log, align ownership, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on permissions so everyone agrees on the same reality. Treat the Facebook Business Managers as infrastructure: if support trail is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you map billing, stress-test billing, and log the outcome. Build the approval cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. Treat the Facebook Business Managers as infrastructure: if spend pattern is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile.

If you are a ops lead coordinating vendors, you want fewer moving parts, not more dashboards. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you separate audit log, lock down ownership, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on supportability so everyone agrees on the same reality. If the seller cannot explain the asset history without hand-waving, that is a governance signal, not a negotiation point. Under handoff-heavy workflow, teams often optimize for speed and forget that admin roster is the real failure domain. (21 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you map access, hand over spend pattern, and log the outcome. (9 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook workflows involve contractors, the question is never ‘can we run ads’—it’s ‘can we unwind access cleanly’. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you hand over access, reconcile admin roster, and log the outcome.

Facebook Facebook advertising accounts: evaluating history, billing, and governance

A Facebook facebook advertising accounts only pays off if governance and access are clean for a two-person media buying duo under compliance. Facebook facebook advertising accounts for multi-client operations and minimal permission creep for sale is safer when you can confirm asset history, implement change control, and rehearse a rollback. Build the audit cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (3 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you lock down permissions, align billing, and log the outcome. Build the audit cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (10 checkpoints, the first 10 days). What looks like a ‘deal’ can be expensive if it creates ongoing manual babysitting. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you separate permissions, separate spend pattern, and log the outcome. Build the approval cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (9 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you align ownership, map admin roster, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you verify admin roster, map admin roster, and log the outcome.

When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you document billing, hand over payment profile, and log the outcome. (21 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you stress-test admin roster, reconcile spend pattern, and log the outcome. (21 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). Under handoff-heavy workflow, teams often optimize for speed and forget that support trail is the real failure domain. If the seller cannot explain the asset history without hand-waving, that is a governance signal, not a negotiation point. (9 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you verify support trail, lock down permissions, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on billing so everyone agrees on the same reality. (8 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you hand over support trail, simulate asset history, and log the outcome.

A compliance-sensitive team wins by reducing ambiguity, not by adding tricks. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you document billing, hand over admin roster, and log the outcome. (5 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you lock down audit log, stress-test support trail, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on supportability so everyone agrees on the same reality. (7 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you map spend pattern, reconcile audit log, and log the outcome. If you cannot simulate billing in writing, you should not treat the asset as production-ready. (4 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you verify audit log, map permissions, and log the outcome. Build the handoff cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you map support trail, align audit log, and log the outcome. (10 checkpoints, the first 10 days).

A table to keep evaluation consistent across assets?

When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you stress-test support trail, separate spend pattern, and log the outcome. Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if access is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you lock down permissions, align audit log, and log the outcome. (9 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). Most incidents start as ‘minor’ audit log confusion and end as weeks of delayed scaling. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you align audit log, align payment profile, and log the outcome. (14 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you stress-test audit log, map ownership, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you document billing, reconcile spend pattern, and log the outcome. (8 checkpoints, the first 10 days).

How to score quickly

Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if support trail is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you document asset history, verify payment profile, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on ownership so everyone agrees on the same reality. When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you simulate spend pattern, map billing, and log the outcome. A small mismatch in ownership can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you separate payment profile, map spend pattern, and log the outcome. (6 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you align permissions, lock down payment profile, and log the outcome. (10 checkpoints, 3–5 business days).

Criterion What to verify Why it matters Pass bar
Documentation pack Is there a handover bundle you can archive? Screens, notes, and checklist stored centrally Screens, notes, and checklist stored centrally
Operational fit Does it match your team’s cadence and tools? Fits weekly audit rhythm and reporting workflow No unknown admins; roles match job duties
Access & admin clarity Can you name the real admins and remove extras safely? No unknown admins; roles match job duties Billing owner documented; no surprise payers
Tracking readiness Will measurement survive day-one changes? Events plan written; naming conventions agreed Fits weekly audit rhythm and reporting workflow
Billing authority Is the payment profile controlled by the right entity? Billing owner documented; no surprise payers Events plan written; naming conventions agreed
Supportability Can you get help without relying on one person? Recovery steps defined; support contact path exists History narrative matches logs and spend pattern

When a ‘pass’ is still a no

When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you map access, stress-test spend pattern, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you align payment profile, reconcile payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook workflows involve contractors, the question is never ‘can we run ads’—it’s ‘can we unwind access cleanly’. (10 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you hand over payment profile, lock down permissions, and log the outcome. (8 checkpoints, one full week). Build the reporting cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. Before you commit, write a one-page note on billing so everyone agrees on the same reality. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you stress-test access, document support trail, and log the outcome. (4 checkpoints, 3–5 business days).

Quick checklist before you approve the purchase

Before you commit, write a one-page note on account history so everyone agrees on the same reality. (30 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you reconcile spend pattern, align spend pattern, and log the outcome. Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if spend pattern is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you simulate access, align asset history, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on account history so everyone agrees on the same reality. When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you align payment profile, stress-test asset history, and log the outcome. Build the audit cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. Most incidents start as ‘minor’ permissions confusion and end as weeks of delayed scaling.

  • Confirm the current admin roster for the Facebook advertising accounts and remove unnecessary roles.
  • Document who owns billing and who can approve payment changes.
  • Set a weekly audit reminder for access, billing events, and anomalies.
  • Lock naming conventions before launching the first campaigns.
  • Archive a handoff bundle (roles, history notes, recovery steps).
  • Run a controlled spend test and reconcile reporting before scaling.
  • Define a pause rule for ambiguous ownership or unexpected permission changes.

Before you commit, write a one-page note on documentation so everyone agrees on the same reality. (21 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you reconcile billing, hand over payment profile, and log the outcome. Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if audit log is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. (6 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). Design the workflow so that losing a single login does not freeze delivery. (10 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you reconcile asset history, lock down ownership, and log the outcome. (6 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). If you are a two-person media buying duo, you want fewer moving parts, not more dashboards. (7 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you separate payment profile, map billing, and log the outcome. (3 checkpoints, the first 10 days).

Hypothetical scenarios: where the process collapses first

When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you map audit log, document audit log, and log the outcome. A small mismatch in payment profile can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you document permissions, map payment profile, and log the outcome. (4 checkpoints, the first 10 days). Under limited budget, teams often optimize for speed and forget that asset history is the real failure domain. (6 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). Most incidents start as ‘minor’ payment profile confusion and end as weeks of delayed scaling. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you simulate ownership, stress-test access, and log the outcome. (3 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). Before you commit, write a one-page note on billing so everyone agrees on the same reality. (30 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you lock down support trail, map access, and log the outcome. The scenarios are hypothetical, meant as rehearsals rather than promises.

Scenario A: online education funnel hit by access drift

Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if spend pattern is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. (3 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). A procurement-style scorecard works because it forces you to write down what you are assuming. (3 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you map payment profile, reconcile support trail, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you separate asset history, lock down permissions, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you stress-test admin roster, stress-test ownership, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on documentation so everyone agrees on the same reality. (10 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you simulate permissions, separate permissions, and log the outcome. (7 checkpoints, two reporting cycles).

Scenario B: B2B SaaS with long sales cycles slowed by billing mismatch

When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you stress-test payment profile, map audit log, and log the outcome. Instead of chasing mythical ‘perfect’ assets, build a process that survives imperfect inputs. (7 checkpoints, the first 10 days). A compliance-sensitive team wins by reducing ambiguity, not by adding tricks. (9 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you map asset history, lock down asset history, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you map ownership, simulate audit log, and log the outcome. (9 checkpoints, one full week). A small mismatch in billing can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you map permissions, lock down support trail, and log the outcome. If you are a two-person media buying duo, you want fewer moving parts, not more dashboards. (12 checkpoints, the first 10 days).

Operational reinforcement?

Backup operator protocol

When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you stress-test access, stress-test payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you simulate permissions, align billing, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you hand over spend pattern, hand over access, and log the outcome. Instead of chasing mythical ‘perfect’ assets, build a process that survives imperfect inputs. (12 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you document admin roster, align billing, and log the outcome. The fastest way to waste budget is to start spend before you verify payment profile and confirm who can approve changes. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you document ownership, lock down admin roster, and log the outcome. The fastest way to waste budget is to start spend before you hand over asset history and confirm who can approve changes. (14 checkpoints, two reporting cycles).

Change log discipline

Think in handoffs: who receives the asset, who validates it, and who signs off before any spend is increased. (14 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you simulate audit log, stress-test audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you lock down payment profile, lock down permissions, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you stress-test payment profile, map payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you hand over audit log, stress-test billing, and log the outcome. (6 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you separate ownership, reconcile spend pattern, and log the outcome. (12 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you hand over audit log, map ownership, and log the outcome.

When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you lock down audit log, simulate payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you simulate support trail, reconcile access, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you reconcile permissions, align support trail, and log the outcome. (4 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you align permissions, verify access, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you document audit log, separate billing, and log the outcome. (5 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). A small mismatch in access can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you lock down access, lock down access, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you reconcile payment profile, simulate access, and log the outcome. (10 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you reconcile permissions, stress-test payment profile, and log the outcome.

The fastest way to waste budget is to start spend before you document permissions and confirm who can approve changes. When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you separate billing, verify billing, and log the outcome. A procurement-style scorecard works because it forces you to write down what you are assuming. (9 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you stress-test ownership, verify asset history, and log the outcome. (4 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you document ownership, separate support trail, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you hand over ownership, separate support trail, and log the outcome. (30 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you lock down access, map permissions, and log the outcome. (5 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you align access, reconcile support trail, and log the outcome. (7 checkpoints, 3–5 business days).

When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you map billing, simulate ownership, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you reconcile payment profile, verify payment profile, and log the outcome. (7 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you separate payment profile, hand over audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you lock down payment profile, reconcile admin roster, and log the outcome. Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if asset history is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. (12 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you simulate payment profile, simulate permissions, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you map permissions, reconcile audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you reconcile audit log, stress-test audit log, and log the outcome.

A small mismatch in permissions can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. (14 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you align support trail, document support trail, and log the outcome. (7 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you reconcile access, align ownership, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you lock down permissions, hand over admin roster, and log the outcome. Your first control point is the admin roster; your second is the billing authority; your third is the audit trail. (21 checkpoints, one full week). Instead of chasing mythical ‘perfect’ assets, build a process that survives imperfect inputs. (9 checkpoints, the first 10 days). Design the workflow so that losing a single login does not freeze delivery. (14 checkpoints, the first 10 days). Before you commit, write a one-page note on ownership so everyone agrees on the same reality. (10 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you align asset history, map support trail, and log the outcome. (4 checkpoints, one full week).

When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you lock down admin roster, map permissions, and log the outcome. The fastest way to waste budget is to start spend before you simulate admin roster and confirm who can approve changes. (6 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you document asset history, separate ownership, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you separate asset history, document support trail, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you stress-test spend pattern, stress-test support trail, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you lock down asset history, reconcile permissions, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you verify access, verify payment profile, and log the outcome. A small mismatch in audit log can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. When Facebook assets move between people, a governed checklist beats memory: you lock down audit log, map permissions, and log the outcome.

Before you commit, write a one-page note on billing so everyone agrees on the same reality. (21 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you stress-test payment profile, reconcile admin roster, and log the outcome. Think in handoffs: who receives the asset, who validates it, and who signs off before any spend is increased. (5 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). Under multi-geo rollout, teams often optimize for speed and forget that asset history is the real failure domain. When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you simulate spend pattern, simulate payment profile, and log the outcome. (10 checkpoints, the first 10 days). The fastest way to waste budget is to start spend before you map admin roster and confirm who can approve changes. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you stress-test billing, reconcile asset history, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you separate permissions, simulate permissions, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you map access, hand over audit log, and log the outcome. (9 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). What looks like a ‘deal’ can be expensive if it creates ongoing manual babysitting. (10 checkpoints, 3–5 business days).

Most incidents start as ‘minor’ support trail confusion and end as weeks of delayed scaling. (10 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you simulate audit log, map spend pattern, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on billing so everyone agrees on the same reality. (3 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you separate access, separate spend pattern, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you align payment profile, hand over payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you document support trail, simulate billing, and log the outcome. If you are a in-house performance team, you want fewer moving parts, not more dashboards. (5 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you stress-test payment profile, separate ownership, and log the outcome. (3 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if admin roster is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you align permissions, align audit log, and log the outcome. (12 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). Your first control point is the admin roster; your second is the billing authority; your third is the audit trail.

A small mismatch in admin roster can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. (21 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you verify audit log, hand over asset history, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you document access, stress-test ownership, and log the outcome. (5 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you map permissions, reconcile permissions, and log the outcome. (14 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). Build the approval cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (7 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). Most incidents start as ‘minor’ spend pattern confusion and end as weeks of delayed scaling. When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you align audit log, align spend pattern, and log the outcome. (12 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you reconcile billing, separate access, and log the outcome. (21 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you verify asset history, verify access, and log the outcome. A good purchase looks boring on paper because every actor—operator, finance, and reviewer—knows their lane. (10 checkpoints, the first 72 hours).

If the seller cannot explain the asset history without hand-waving, that is a governance signal, not a negotiation point. (12 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you hand over access, lock down support trail, and log the outcome. Before you commit, write a one-page note on supportability so everyone agrees on the same reality. (4 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you map ownership, verify spend pattern, and log the outcome. A small mismatch in asset history can cascade into reporting errors and slow creative iteration. When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you align permissions, reconcile payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you lock down access, lock down payment profile, and log the outcome. Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if audit log is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. Keep the asset boundary crisp: separate who owns payment profile from who operates day-to-day. (12 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). Design the workflow so that losing a single login does not freeze delivery. (3 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you simulate ownership, align admin roster, and log the outcome.

When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you reconcile billing, verify support trail, and log the outcome. What looks like a ‘deal’ can be expensive if it creates ongoing manual babysitting. (12 checkpoints, the first 72 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you align admin roster, document spend pattern, and log the outcome. (6 checkpoints, one full week). When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you document permissions, stress-test billing, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you hand over asset history, reconcile asset history, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you reconcile asset history, verify support trail, and log the outcome. (4 checkpoints, 24–48 hours). When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you separate asset history, hand over audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you map ownership, hand over audit log, and log the outcome. A compliance-sensitive team wins by reducing ambiguity, not by adding tricks. (8 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if support trail is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. (5 checkpoints, two reporting cycles).

When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you hand over support trail, reconcile ownership, and log the outcome. Build the reporting cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (3 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you stress-test admin roster, reconcile audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you simulate access, verify asset history, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you map support trail, simulate support trail, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you document ownership, align audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you verify support trail, lock down payment profile, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you map support trail, document support trail, and log the outcome. (10 checkpoints, the first 10 days). Even when you scale fast, the goal is to keep changes reversible within the first 10 days. When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you simulate support trail, simulate ownership, and log the outcome. Under time pressure, teams often optimize for speed and forget that payment profile is the real failure domain.

If you are a two-person media buying duo, you want fewer moving parts, not more dashboards. When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you verify admin roster, lock down spend pattern, and log the outcome. (8 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). Most incidents start as ‘minor’ access confusion and end as weeks of delayed scaling. (12 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you verify admin roster, stress-test billing, and log the outcome. The fastest way to waste budget is to start spend before you separate audit log and confirm who can approve changes. When Facebook assets move between people, a documented checklist beats memory: you reconcile ownership, verify audit log, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a risk-aware checklist beats memory: you verify admin roster, document support trail, and log the outcome. (21 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you simulate access, simulate spend pattern, and log the outcome. (6 checkpoints, one full week). Keep the asset boundary crisp: separate who owns ownership from who operates day-to-day. Treat the Facebook advertising accounts as infrastructure: if admin roster is unclear, the rest of the stack becomes fragile. (8 checkpoints, 3–5 business days). When Facebook assets move between people, a stable checklist beats memory: you reconcile access, hand over billing, and log the outcome.

Build the audit cadence first, then choose assets that fit it; reversing the order creates chaos. (6 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a handoff-ready checklist beats memory: you reconcile ownership, separate support trail, and log the outcome. (7 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). If the seller cannot explain the asset history without hand-waving, that is a governance signal, not a negotiation point. (14 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a verifiable checklist beats memory: you lock down billing, document asset history, and log the outcome. A procurement-style scorecard works because it forces you to write down what you are assuming. (3 checkpoints, two reporting cycles). When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you document audit log, separate ownership, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a audit-friendly checklist beats memory: you separate permissions, verify access, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a clean checklist beats memory: you simulate spend pattern, map spend pattern, and log the outcome. When Facebook assets move between people, a traceable checklist beats memory: you hand over ownership, map billing, and log the outcome. (9 checkpoints, the first 10 days). When Facebook assets move between people, a well-scoped checklist beats memory: you lock down billing, verify admin roster, and log the outcome.